Self-Reflective for Deontological Ethical Theories- myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theSelf-Reflective for Deontological Ethical Theories. Answer: This case presents the contrasting nature of morality. Based on the deontological ethical theories, Robert Latimers decision to kill her daughter was morally wrong. Every individual has a moral responsibility to protect life. Precisely, the deontological ethical theories take a normative ethical position that judges the morality of an act based on established rules. In this respect, what Latimer did was morally wrong as it violated the existing laws on murder. As illustrated by moral absolutism theory and the divine command theory, actions such as killing another person are considered immoral regardless of the situations inciting them. Consequently, judging from the moral absolutism theory and the divine command perspectives, Latimers action was immoral. However, based on the teleological interpretations, Latimers actions were morally right as they saved Tracy from the pain that she was undergoing. Furthermore, Tracys condition was incurable and was causing her family severe psychological and economic distress. From this perspective, Latimers actions are morally correct since he saved her daughter from severe pain and suffering. Teleological theories opine that the morality of an act is defined by its outcomes. Specifically, Latimers actions are supported by ethical utilitarianism. Killing Tracy promoted the greatest happiness to the majority because her family, society, and herself were saved from the severe pain and suffering. Although it is considered morally wrong to end the life of another person from the deontological view, mercy killing should be permitted in some cases. When an individual is undergoing intense suffering and pain from an incurable disease, euthanasia should be seen from the teleological perspective as saving the individual from suffering and pain. However, before carrying out euthanasia, the patient must be consulted. If they agree, a specialist should be contracted to execute euthanasia. I choose the teleological position since it promotes development and satisfaction of human life on earth. In fact, human life is not defined by its existence but by its quality. In this respect, human actions should be judged by their outcomes not set absolutes. However, some people may object the legalization of euthanasia. The critics of mercy killing would argue that its legalization will increase negligence in the healthcare sector. Moreover, they will argue from the deontologists' viewpoint that it violates the moral obligation of humans to protect life. In this view, physicians would intentionally kill patients out of negligence and claim that they were critically ill. However, these claims are based on partial opinions and fear of the unknown. The law legalizing mercy killing will explicitly explain how the act should be conducted and hold the physicians liable for any misconduct. On the argument about the right to life, it is vital to consider the quality of life a person is living. There is no gain in living a miserable life full of pain and suffering. In this respect, it is vital to consider mercy killing as an act of compassion, not murder.